Types Of Maintenance

English | Español

This article attempts to detail the traditional division into types of maintenance, noting that this division, apart from a simple academic concept or training purposes, it is not more useful. It is not possible to determine that a particular machine, the type of maintenance to be applied is one of the traditional (corrective, scheduled, predictive, etc.). It is more practical to apply another concept: the maintenance model. Different models of maintenance defined as a mixture of different types of maintenance in the proportions necessary for each equipment.

Santiago García Garrido
RENOVETEC Technical Director

1. Types of maintenance

Traditionally, 5 types of maintenance have been distinguished, which are differentiated by the nature of the tasks that they include:

  • Corrective maintenance: The set of tasks is destined to correct the defects to be found in the different equipment and that are communicated to the maintenance department by users of the same equipment.
  • Preventive Maintenance: Its mission is to maintain a level of certain service on equipment, programming the interventions of their vulnerabilities in the most opportune time. It is used to be a systematic character, that is, the equipment is inspected even if it has not given any symptoms of having a problem.
  • Predictive Maintenance: It pursues constantly know and report the status and operational capacity of the installations by knowing the values of certain variables, which represent such state and operational ability. To apply this maintenance, it is necessary to identify physical variables (temperature, vibration, power consumption, etc.). Which variation is indicative of problems that may be appearing on the equipment. This maintenance it is the most technical, since it requires advanced technical resources, and at times of strong mathematical, physical and / or technical knowledge.
  • Zero Hours Maintenance (Overhaul): The set of tasks whose goal is to review the equipment at scheduled intervals before appearing any failure, either when the reliability of the equipment has decreased considerably so it is risky to make forecasts of production capacity . This review is based on leaving the equipment to zero hours of operation, that is, as if the equipment were new. These reviews will replace or repair all items subject to wear. The aim is to ensure, with high probability, a good working time fixed in advance.
  • Periodic maintenance (Time Based Maintenance TBM): the basic maintenance of equipment made by the users of it. It consists of a series of elementary tasks (data collections, visual inspections, cleaning, lubrication, re tightening screws,…) for which no extensive training is necessary, but perhaps only a brief training. This type of maintenance is the based on TPM (Total Productive Maintenance).

2. The difficulty of finding a practical application to the types of maintenance

This division of types of maintenance has the disadvantage of that each equipment needs a mix of each of these maintenance types, so that we can not think of applying one of them to a particular equipment.

Thus, for a particular engine, we will take care of lubrication (periodic preventive maintenance); if it is required, we will measure the vibrations or temperature (predictive maintenance);we also may qualify for an annual tune-up (overhaul) and we will repair the faults coming up(corrective maintenance). The most suitable mixture of these types of maintenance will dictate to us strict reasons linked to the cost of production losses in a stop that equipment, the repair cost, environmental impact, safety and quality of a product or a service, among others.

The disadvantage, therefore, of the anterior division is that it is not able to give a clear answer to this question:

Which is the maintenance that should be applied to each of the equipment that make up a particular plant?

To answer this question it is convenient to define the concept of Maintenance Models. A Maintenance Model is a mixture of the previous types of maintenance in certain proportions, and it responds appropriately to the needs of a particular equipment. We think that every equipment will need a different mix of different types of maintenance, a particular mix of tasks, so that maintenance models will be as many as existing equipment. But this is not entirely correct. 4 of these mixtures can be clearly identified, and they can be supplemented with two types of additional tasks, as we shall see.

3. Maintenance models

Each of the models presented below include several of the previous types of maintenance at the indicated rate. Moreover, all of them include two activities: visual inspections and lubrication. This is because it is demonstrated that these tasks realization in any equipment is profitable. Even in the simplest model (Corrective Model), in which virtually the equipment is left on its own and we do not deal with it until a fault occurs. It is advisable to observe it at least once a month, lubricate it with suitable products to their characteristics.

Visual inspections virtually no cost money (these inspections will be included in a range where we have to look at other nearby equipment, so it will not mean we have to allocate resources specifically for this function). This inspection allows us to detect faults in an early stage and its resolution will generally be cheaper as soon as detected. Lubrication is always profitable. Although it does represent a cost (lubricant and labor), it is generally so low that it is more than warranted, since a malfunction due to a lack of lubrication will always involve a greater expense than the corresponding to lubricant application.With this remark, we can already define the various possible maintenance models.

A. CORRECTIVE MODEL: This is the most basic model, and includes, in addition to visual inspections and lubrication mentioned previously, the arising breakdowns repair. It is applied, as we will see, to equipment with the lowest level of criticality, whose faults are not a problem, economically or technically. In this type of equipment is not profitable to devote more resources and efforts.

B. CONDITIONAL MODEL: It includes the activities of the previous model, and also this model carries out a series of tests that will determine a subsequent action. If after testing we discovered an anomaly, we will schedule an intervention; on the contrary, if everything is correct, we will not act on the equipment.
This maintenance model is valid in equipment not to very used, or for equipment that despite being important in the production system the probability of failure is low.

C. SYSTEMATIC MODEL: This model includes a set of tasks we will perform no matter what is the condition of the equipment , also we will perform some measurements and tests to decide whether to carry out other tasks of greater magnitude, and finally, we will repair faults that arise. It is a model widely used in equipment of medium availability, of some importance in the production system whose failures cause some disruption. It is important to note that equipment subjected to a systematic maintenance model does not have to have all its tasks with a fixed schedule. Just a equipment with this model of maintenance can have systematic tasks that are carried out regardless of the time it have been operated or state of the elements on which it works. It is the main difference with the previous two models in which to perform a maintenance task should be some sign of failure.

An example of equipment subjected to this maintenance model is a discontinuous reactor, in which the tasks that must react are introduced at once, the reaction takes place, and then the reaction product is extracted before making a new load. Regardless of this reactor is doubled or not, when operating should be reliable, so it is warranted a series of tasks regardless of whether any signs of failure have been arose.

Other examples:

  • The landing gear of an aircraft
  • The engine of an aircraft

D. HIGH AVAILABILITY MAINTENANCE MODEL: It is the most demanding and exhaustive model of them. It is applied to that equipment that under no circumstances may suffer a breakdown or malfunction. These are equipment to whom are also required very high levels of availability, above 90%. The reason for such high level of availability is generally high cost in production due to a fault. With a demand so high, there is no time to stop the equipment if the maintenance requires it (corrective, preventive, systematic). 

To maintain this equipment is necessary to use predictive maintenance techniques that allow us to know the status of the equipment when is working, and scheduled shutdowns, which supposes a complete overhaul, with a frequency usually annually or higher. This review will replace, in general, all parts subject to wear or failure probability over the years (parts with a lifetime less than two years). These reviews are prepared well in advance and not have to be exactly the same every year.

Since in this model the corrective maintenance is not included, that is, the aim should be zero breakdowns on this equipment; usually there is no time to properly address the issues that occur, being desirable in many cases quick provisional repairs that will maintain the equipment working until the next overhaul. Therefore, the Annual Overhaul must include the resolution of all those provisional repairs that have had to be made throughout the year.

Examples of this model of maintenance may be:

  • Turbine of power production
  • high temperature furnaces, where an intervention means cooling and re-heating the furnace, resulting in energy expense and production losses associated with it.
  • Rotating equipment working continuously
  • Reactor deposits or reaction tanks not duplicated that are the basis of production and to be kept in operation as many hours as possible.

4. Other considerations

When designing the Maintenance Plan should be taken into account two important considerations affecting some equipment in particular. Firstly, some equipment are subjected to legal rules that regulate their maintenance, forcing them to perform certain activities with an established frequency.

Secondly, some of the maintenance activities can not be performed with the regular maintenance equipment (either their own or hired) because it requires knowledge and / or specific resources that are only up to the manufacturer, distributor or a specialist team.

These two aspects should be assessed when trying to determine the maintenance model that we should apply to an equipment.

A. LEGAL MAINTENANCE: Some equipment are subjected to rules or regulations by the Administration. Above all, there are equipment that are hazardous to people or the environment. The Administration requires the completion of a series of tasks, tests and inspections, and some of them must be performed by companies duly authorized to carry them out. These tasks must necessarily be incorporated into the Maintenance Plan of the equipment, whatever model you decide to apply.

Some of the equipment subjected to this type of maintenance are:

  • Equipment and devices under pressure
  • Installation of High and Medium Voltage
  • Cooling Towers
  • Certain lifts: service or people
  • Vehicles
  • Fire Prevention Facilities
  • Storage tanks of certain chemicals

B. SUBCONTRACTED MAINTENANCE TO A SPECIALIST: When we talk about a specialist, we refer to an individual or a company specialized in a particular equipment. The specialist may be the equipment manufacturer, importer’s technical service, or a company that has specialized in a particular type of intervention. As we said, we must turn to a specialist when:

  • We do not have sufficient knowledge
  • We do not have the necessary resources

If there are these circumstances, some or all of maintenance work must be outsourced to specialized companies.

The subcontracted maintenance to a specialist is usually the most expensive alternative, as the company offering it is aware that not compete. The prices are not market prices, but monopoly prices. You should try to avoid it as far as possible by cost increase and higher external dependence that it involves. The most reasonable way to avoid this is to develop a training plan that includes specific training for those equipment that do not have enough knowledge also acquired the necessary technical means.